Second opinions in financial planning can serve as valuable checkpoints on the journey to financial security. Just as you might seek another doctor’s opinion before a major medical procedure, a second look at a financial plan can reveal blind spots, confirm sound strategies, or uncover new opportunities.

Many clients seek second opinions not because they distrust prior advice, but to confirm they are on the right path. Others come with specific concerns or the desire to ensure their advisor’s recommendations align with their personal objectives. Still others may have found that their current advisor just isn’t the right fit and someone they want to work with in a long-term professional relationship.

No matter the circumstances, the key is to handle the situation professionally, ethically, and thoughtfully. Here are some things to consider if you are approached by someone seeking a second opinion or looking for an alternative viewpoint to their current plan.

Build Trust Through Active Listening

The foundation of any successful second opinion begins with genuine, attentive listening. When clients seek a second opinion on their financial plan, they often carry unspoken concerns they can’t easily articulate. Creating an environment where clients feel comfortable sharing both their financial details and emotional uncertainties is essential.

Start by asking thoughtful, open-ended questions that invite detailed responses rather than simple yes or no answers. Questions like “What prompted you to seek another perspective on your financial plan?” or “What aspects of your current financial strategy keep you up at night?” encourage clients to share their true motivations and worries.

Pay particular attention to what clients say about their current advisor relationship. When a prospect mentions they’re “not sure if I’m on the right track” or “I wonder if I’m missing something,” they’re often signaling deeper concerns about trust or comprehension. These subtle cues can reveal opportunities to demonstrate your value through education and transparency.

Throughout this discovery process, maintain a balance between professional expertise and approachable demeanor. Technical competence builds credibility, while emotional intelligence builds connection. Both are necessary to establish the trust required for clients to feel confident in the relationship being developed.

Uphold Professional Integrity When Reviewing Another Advisor’s Work

When a client seeks a second opinion on their financial plan, they’re placing tremendous trust in your expertise and ethical standards. How you handle this delicate situation speaks volumes about your professional character and integrity.

The cornerstone of providing a second opinion is maintaining respect for advice that was previously provided. Financial planning isn’t always a precise science with only one correct answer. It’s a discipline where different valid approaches can achieve similar outcomes. Acknowledging this reality is essential when reviewing another professional’s work.

Rather than pointing out perceived flaws or shortcomings in the existing plan, focusing energy on identifying opportunities to add value can create an effective framework to deliver advice. This subtle shift in perspective transforms what could be a negative critique into a constructive enhancement.

When differences in approach arise, consider explaining them objectively to help clients understand the reasoning behind your recommendations. This might sound like: “Your current allocation follows a traditional age-based approach, which is widely accepted. Another approach we can consider is based on your specific income needs and risk tolerance, which might look more like this…”

Navigating difficult conversations about existing plans requires particular finesse. When clients express dissatisfaction with their current advisor or plan, avoid capitalizing on their frustration. Instead, ask thoughtful questions that help them articulate specific concerns—without asking leading questions that might pit them against their current advisor.

Remember, your ultimate ethical obligation is to act in the client’s best interest, not just win their business. Sometimes this means acknowledging when their current plan is fundamentally sound, even if it differs from your preferred approach. Your professional integrity shines brightest when you’re willing to validate another advisor’s good work.

Structure Your Approach to Financial Plan Reviews

When clients seek a second opinion on their financial plan, they deserve a methodical, thorough review that respects their time while delivering meaningful insights. The process should follow a clear structure that builds trust and demonstrates your expertise without overwhelming the client.

The initial consultation sets the tone for the entire relationship. Begin by explaining how your review process works, including timeframes, the documentation you’ll need, and what the client can expect at each stage. This transparency helps manage expectations and reduces anxiety about the unknown.

Use sophisticated planning software to model different scenarios and quantify potential improvements. This data-driven approach transforms abstract concepts into concrete numbers that clients can understand and evaluate.

When presenting findings, clarity is paramount. Avoid industry jargon and technical terms that might confuse clients. Instead, focus on explaining concepts in plain language with real-world examples. Visual aids like charts and graphs can help illustrate complex ideas and make your recommendations more accessible.

Throughout the process, set appropriate expectations. Make it clear that a second opinion might validate much of their existing plan while highlighting opportunities for improvement. This balanced approach demonstrates objectivity and reinforces your commitment to helping them make confident, informed decisions.

Uncover Overlooked Opportunities in Client Plans

When reviewing a client’s existing financial plan, I’ve found that even well-crafted strategies often contain untapped potential. The most valuable service you can provide during a second opinion is identifying overlooked opportunities that could significantly enhance a client’s financial trajectory.

The goal isn’t to criticize the client’s current advisor but to illuminate possibilities they may not have considered. By focusing on opportunities rather than shortcomings, you demonstrate your expertise while allowing the client to draw their own conclusions about the comprehensiveness of their current plan.

Ensure Transparent Fee and Service Discussions

When providing a second opinion on a financial plan, transparency about your fee structure and service model is non-negotiable. Clients seeking alternative perspectives often evaluate not just the plan itself, but also the overall value proposition of their advisory relationship.

Begin your fee discussion as early as possible in the consultation process. Rather than positioning fees as an afterthought, integrate them into your explanation of how you work. This demonstrates confidence in your value and eliminates uncomfortable surprises later in the relationship.

If the client’s current advisor uses a different fee model than yours (AUM versus flat fee, for example), explain the differences without suggesting one is inherently superior. Your goal is to help them understand how each approach might influence the advisory relationship.

Be prepared to customize your offering based on the client’s specific situation. Some clients may need comprehensive planning while others require focused advice. Being flexible allows you to meet clients where they are.

Remember that transparency extends beyond just stating your fees—it includes clearly articulating what clients can expect throughout the relationship. Provide specific examples of communication frequency, meeting cadence, and how you measure progress toward their goals.

Clear, upfront communication about fees and services builds trust and sets the tone for a lasting relationship grounded in transparency and mutual understanding.

Empower Client Decisions Without Pressure

The most meaningful financial planning relationships begin with trust, not pressure. When providing a second opinion, your primary goal should be delivering genuine value through actionable insights—regardless of whether the client ultimately decides to work with you.

The hallmark of a true financial professional is the ability to offer meaningful guidance without attaching strings. This means presenting your findings and recommendations clearly, then stepping back to let clients process the information at their own pace. When you’ve conducted a thorough analysis, the value you provide speaks for itself without hard-selling tactics.

Consider framing your recommendations as options rather than directives: “Based on your goals, here are three approaches you might consider…” This positions you as a trusted advisor rather than a salesperson pushing for conversion. Remember that clients seeking second opinions often already feel uncertain. Adding pressure only compounds their stress and diminishes their trust in the process.

Ultimately, the client who chooses you based on demonstrated expertise rather than persuasive tactics becomes not just a client but an advocate. By focusing on empowerment, not pressure, you lay the groundwork for lasting, trust-based advisory relationships.

Manage Transitions with Professional Courtesy

When a client switches financial advisors after receiving a second opinion, the way the change is handled reflects on both the client and the new advisor. A smooth, respectful transition benefits everyone.

For clients who decide to change, offering guidance on how to communicate their decision professionally can be invaluable. A simple message acknowledging the advisor’s past service while clearly stating their decision to move in a different direction is sufficient.

If the client initiates negative conversations about the previous advisor, steer them toward discussions on the path forward and the implementation of new strategies. This approach demonstrates your professionalism and reinforces the client’s confidence in their decision.

Finally, acknowledge that changing advisors can be emotionally challenging for clients. They may feel guilty about leaving a long-term relationship or anxious about whether they’re making the right decision. Providing reassurance while respecting their relationship with their previous advisor helps clients navigate these emotions and start the new advisory relationship on positive footing.

DISCLAIMER: The eMoney Advisor Blog is meant as an educational and informative resource for financial professionals and individuals alike. It is not meant to be, and should not be taken as financial, legal, tax or other professional advice. Those seeking professional advice may do so by consulting with a professional advisor. eMoney Advisor will not be liable for any actions you may take based on the content of this blog.

The views and opinions expressed by this blog post guest are solely those of the guest and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of eMoney Advisor, LLC. eMoney Advisor is not responsible for the content, views or opinions presented by our guest, nor may eMoney Advisor be held liable for any actions taken by you based on the content, views or opinions of the guest.

Mariner is not affiliated with eMoney Advisor, LLC. This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered individualized investment advice. Mariner is the marketing name for the financial services businesses of Mariner Wealth Advisors, LLC and its subsidiaries.

Kyle Grabenstetter offers investment advisory services through Mariner Wealth, an SEC registered investment adviser. For additional information about Mariner’s services and fees, please contact Mariner directly or refer to its Form ADV Part 2A, available at the Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website (www.adviserinfo.sec.gov). Registration of an investment adviser does not imply a certain level of skill or training. All investments involve risk, including the possible loss of principal.

You may also be interested in...